Digital marketing strategist with over 10 years of experience, specializing in SEO and content creation for small businesses.
It's slightly uncomfortable to reveal, but I'll say it. Five books rest beside my bed, all incompletely consumed. Inside my mobile device, I'm partway through 36 audiobooks, which seems small compared to the forty-six Kindle titles I've left unfinished on my e-reader. This doesn't include the increasing pile of pre-release editions next to my living room table, vying for endorsements, now that I am a professional author myself.
On the surface, these numbers might appear to corroborate recently expressed comments about current attention spans. An author observed a short while ago how simple it is to distract a individual's concentration when it is fragmented by social media and the 24-hour news. He suggested: “Perhaps as individuals' focus periods shift the literature will have to change with them.” Yet as a person who previously would stubbornly get through any title I picked up, I now consider it a individual choice to stop reading a book that I'm not connecting with.
I don't feel that this habit is caused by a limited concentration – instead it relates to the awareness of life moving swiftly. I've always been impressed by the spiritual teaching: “Keep death each day in view.” One idea that we each have a only limited time on this Earth was as shocking to me as to anyone else. But at what other point in human history have we ever had such immediate entry to so many amazing works of art, anytime we desire? A surplus of riches meets me in every library and on any device, and I aim to be purposeful about where I direct my attention. Could “not finishing” a book (term in the publishing industry for Incomplete) be not just a indication of a limited mind, but a selective one?
Particularly at a time when the industry (and therefore, acquisition) is still dominated by a certain social class and its concerns. Although engaging with about characters unlike us can help to build the muscle for empathy, we furthermore read to think about our personal journeys and place in the universe. Before the titles on the shelves more fully represent the identities, stories and issues of potential readers, it might be very challenging to hold their attention.
Certainly, some novelists are skillfully creating for the “today's attention span”: the concise style of certain current books, the compact pieces of additional writers, and the short parts of several modern titles are all a excellent showcase for a more concise style and technique. And there is an abundance of craft guidance aimed at securing a audience: hone that opening line, improve that start, increase the tension (higher! further!) and, if creating thriller, introduce a dead body on the beginning. That advice is all sound – a possible agent, house or audience will devote only a a handful of limited seconds choosing whether or not to forge ahead. There's no benefit in being contrary, like the writer on a workshop I joined who, when questioned about the storyline of their book, announced that “the meaning emerges about three-quarters of the way through”. No writer should force their audience through a series of challenges in order to be understood.
But I absolutely write to be clear, as much as that is achievable. At times that requires guiding the consumer's attention, guiding them through the story step by succinct step. At other times, I've understood, understanding requires patience – and I must grant my own self (as well as other writers) the freedom of meandering, of layering, of straying, until I find something true. A particular author makes the case for the novel finding innovative patterns and that, rather than the conventional narrative arc, “different forms might assist us imagine innovative methods to create our tales vital and real, continue creating our books novel”.
In that sense, both viewpoints converge – the novel may have to change to accommodate the today's audience, as it has continually achieved since it originated in the 18th century (in the form currently). It could be, like past authors, coming writers will go back to serialising their works in publications. The future these authors may currently be sharing their work, part by part, on web-based services like those accessed by millions of regular users. Creative mediums evolve with the era and we should allow them.
Yet we should not assert that every shifts are entirely because of reduced focus. If that were the case, brief fiction collections and flash fiction would be viewed much more {commercial|profitable|marketable
Digital marketing strategist with over 10 years of experience, specializing in SEO and content creation for small businesses.